City Councilor Belinda Ray
  • About
  • Blog
  • Endorsements
  • Contact

Email Exchange Regarding Deferred Maintenance, Significant Investments 

3/18/2017

 
In December, Superintendent Botana requested that Emily Figdor, a leader of Protect Our Neighborhood Schools, stay away from the significant deferred maintenance language when they were working together to craft the flyer that went home in students backpacks earlier this year.

A portion of their email exchange is below.
-----------------
On December 15, 2016 at 9:25:54 PM, Xavier Botana (botanx@portlandschools.org) wrote:

I would prefer to eliminate the language about "significant investments" not being made.  

"Significant" is fairly subjective.  At both Presumpscot and Lyseth the principals went out of their way to talk about the many improvements in their physical plant in recent years (mechanics, new windows, etc.).  

I would prefer to focus on the fact that in 40-60 years, how schools are structured has changed greatly.  Students have more differentiated needs which requires frequent regrouping a small group instruction, teachers are asked to collaborate with each other, we place a premium on presentations and other exhibitions of student performance... none of the four schools can accommodate that.  
​
Note that we just received a facility assessment for all of our buildings and the four schools have differing levels of needs (i.e., Reiche has large needs, Presumpscot not so much) and non-BFOF schools have much larger needs than most of the BFOF schools.  So, focusing on delayed investments in those four schools begs the question about the other delayed investments.  So, I would prefer to steer away from the delayed needs/upkeep and focus on the 21st Century Learning needs.
 
Beyond that, I'm comfortable with the examples you provide and with the overall approach.  Please share the final copy so that I can give principals the heads up that their PTO is going to come with the flyer for distribution in backpacks.
 
Thanks,

Xavier
—————--
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Emily Figdor <emilyjfigdor@gmail.com> wrote:
 
Terrific, thank you! I made the edits you suggested, and the final is attached. I’m coordinating with the PTOs at the four schools.
 
Also, is the facility assessment a public document? If so, I’d love to see it.
 
Thanks for all you’re doing, and good to work with you on this!
 
Best,
 
Emily
Emily Figdor

Comments are closed.
    Sign up for my
    quarterly newsletter
    ​to receive regular Council updates. 

    Topics

    All
    Budget
    Cave/Caveat
    COVID 19
    Elections/Campaign Finance
    Housing
    India Street
    Local Business
    Paid Sick Leave
    Public Comment
    Quality Of Life Issues
    School Funding/Renovations
    Shelter/Homelessness
    Transit/Transportation
    Zoning/Land Use

    Archives

    October 2021
    July 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016

    RSS Feed

This website has been paid for and authorized by the candidate.
About         Blog         Endorsements         Contact